Ipratropium

Evidence Level: L1 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Ipratropium
  2. Ipratropium: From Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease to Obstructive Lung Disease
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. New Zealand Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Ipratropium: From Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease to Obstructive Lung Disease

One-Sentence Summary

Ipratropium is an inhaled and intranasal anticholinergic (muscarinic antagonist) originally used for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), rhinitis, bronchitis and emphysema. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for obstructive lung disease, with 25 clinical trials and 20 publications retrieved. This prediction largely confirms an existing use rather than a true new indication.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), allergic rhinitis, vasomotor rhinitis, bronchitis, emphysema (from the knowledge graph; no approved indication text is available from New Zealand licences)
Predicted New Indication Obstructive lung disease
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.97%
Evidence Level L1
New Zealand Market Status Cancelled only (no currently valid licences)
Number of Authorizations 5 (all cancelled)
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Pharmacology records show that ipratropium binds muscarinic receptors M1 to M5 (CHRM1–CHRM5). It is a non-selective muscarinic antagonist, and its recorded clinical use is bronchospasm associated with COPD.

Blocking M3 receptors on airway smooth muscle reduces vagally mediated bronchoconstriction, which is the core physiological problem in obstructive lung disease. The predicted indication overlaps heavily with the drug's original uses (COPD, bronchitis, emphysema), so this is mostly confirmation of an established use rather than true repurposing.

Lower-ranked predictions (nasal cavity disease, pharyngitis, tracheal disease, anaphylaxis and others) have much weaker support. Most have only indirect or preclinical evidence, or none at all, and are not recommended for advancement.

Clinical Trial Evidence

The 10 most relevant trials for obstructive lung disease are shown below (25 were retrieved).

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT02177253 Phase 3 Completed 1118 12-week comparison of ipratropium/salbutamol via Respimat vs COMBIVENT aerosol, ipratropium Respimat and placebo in COPD
NCT01415518 Phase 4 Completed 581 Symbicort added to Atrovent plus theophylline in severe COPD
NCT01136421 Phase 3 Completed 124 Magnesium sulfate vs ipratropium bromide added to short-acting β2 agonist in COPD exacerbations
NCT02172469 Phase 3 Completed 215 Tiotropium vs Atrovent MDI in COPD
NCT00239434 Phase 3 Completed 200 Tiotropium once daily vs Atrovent MDI four times daily in COPD
NCT02172404 Phase 3 Completed 160 HandiHaler vs pressurised MDI: administration technique and ease of use in COPD (delivery, not efficacy)
NCT02260011 Phase 2 Completed 41 Ipratropium HFA-134a vs Atrovent CFC aerosol: bronchodilator comparability in COPD
NCT01691482 Phase 4 Completed 56 Daily lung function with albuterol and ipratropium, alone and combined, in COPD
NCT00371527 NA Completed 200 Randomised placebo-controlled trial of ipratropium for acute bronchitis in people without underlying lung disease
NCT04446637 Phase 3 Withdrawn 0 Ipratropium/levosalbutamol fixed-dose combination vs free combination in COPD; no participants enrolled

Only one large, completed, directly relevant Phase 3 trial (NCT02177253) was graded as strong direct efficacy evidence. Several trials test combinations or compare devices, so they do not isolate the effect of ipratropium alone.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
26391969 2015 Cochrane review Cochrane Database Syst Rev Tiotropium vs ipratropium bromide in stable COPD; both are recognised treatments
24043433 2013 Cochrane review Cochrane Database Syst Rev Earlier version of the tiotropium vs ipratropium comparison
35616126 2022 Review Cochrane Database Syst Rev Magnesium sulfate as an adjunct in COPD exacerbations
23170031 2012 Review Ann Pharmacother Efficacy and safety of ipratropium used together with tiotropium in COPD
20163324 2010 Review Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol Mechanism, efficacy and safety of albuterol, ipratropium and their combination in COPD
10565879 1999 Review Respir Care Clin N Am Ipratropium is a safe and effective bronchodilator in COPD, alone and with albuterol
2977109 1988 Review Clin Pharm Pharmacology, kinetics, efficacy, adverse effects and dosing of ipratropium in obstructive lung disease
25515181 2015 Guideline Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol Finnish guideline for diagnosis and pharmacotherapy of stable COPD
38457591 2024 Retrospective study Medicine Probiotics added to budesonide plus ipratropium in 118 COPD patients
15987237 2005 Review Treat Respir Med Ipratropium HFA metered-dose inhaler for maintenance treatment of bronchospasm

The literature is dominated by reviews. No randomised trial publications were identified among the retrieved items.

New Zealand Market Information

All five licences are cancelled, and no approved indication text is available.

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
2643154 Accord Nebuliser solution, 250 mcg/ml, 2 ml ampoule Not available (cancelled)
2145782 Atrovent Aerosol inhaler, 20 mcg per dose, CFC-free Not available (cancelled)
2154307 Univent Nebuliser solution, 250 mcg/ml, 2 ml ampoule Not available (cancelled)
2372908 Univent Aqueous nasal spray, 0.03% Not available (cancelled)
2724863 Ipratropium Viatris Nebuliser solution, 250 mcg/ml, 2 ml ampoule Not available (cancelled)

Safety Considerations

  • Disease associations flagged as contraindications in the knowledge graph (not taken from label text): hypertension, long QT syndrome, epilepsy, potassium deficiency, diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, bladder neck obstruction, ocular hypertension, angle-closure glaucoma, acidosis, sudden cardiac arrest, heart conduction disease, hyperthyroidism/Graves disease/thyrotoxicosis, myocardial ischemia and coronary artery disease. These need verification against the current package insert.
  • Drug interactions: The interaction query returned only receptor-binding records (muscarinic M1–M5), with no drug–drug interaction entries.
  • Other signals from the literature: A case report describes severe anaphylaxis after ipratropium inhalation, and another describes unilateral mydriasis after inhalation in an infant.

Package insert warnings and contraindications could not be retrieved, so please refer to the package insert for authoritative safety information.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale:

  • Obstructive lung disease is essentially an established use of ipratropium. A large completed Phase 3 trial and extensive review literature support it, but the indication is not new.
  • There are no valid New Zealand licences at present, and package insert safety data are missing, so any reintroduction needs regulatory and safety work first.
  • The other predicted indications are not recommended to advance. Nasal cavity disease and respiratory malformation are research questions at most. Pharyngitis, acute laryngopharyngitis, papillary conjunctivitis, Rienhoff syndrome, tracheal disease, anaphylaxis and food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis are on Hold.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Medsafe package insert warnings and contraindications, which block safety screening
  • Detailed mechanism of action data from DrugBank
  • Clarification of why all New Zealand licences were cancelled, and whether a new application or a different product is required
  • A review of the knowledge-graph contraindications (cardiovascular, glaucoma, urinary retention and others) against label text
  • Confirmation of which formulation (nebulised, inhaler or nasal) is intended for any new use

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). This report is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.